Site menu:

RSS AlertNet

Site search

Categories

August 2005
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Oct »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Archive

Smithers sorts it out

Andrew Smithers, the voice of reason, and Bernard Dumas of INSEAD want a market in pension obligations. They suggest something similar to the collateralised debt obligations used to trade credit card debt. This would enable the substantial and possibly unhedgeable company risk to be diversified. In effect savers would be able to draw their pension from several companies instead of one.

I’m sure that the world would be a better place if there was one but it will arrive over the dead bodies of accountants, actuaries and their employers. People who found the MFR too onerous will not want their funding gaps on display to the whole world. CDOs and CMOs are usually aggregated by the institution gathering the assets but in this case the lenders are small individuals with complicated contracts and the borrowers are often large companies. I think the following would have to happen:

  • Legislation forcing companies to make pension fund assets tradeable
  • Separation of the insurance and investment components of pensions so that the tradeable assets could be used to back different pension schemes.
  • Vehicles making access to the market simple enough for individuals to self manage.
  • I don’t think any of these are intrinsically impossible but there may not be any appropriate assets left by the time any of the measures are agreed. Companies would lobby hard to prevent the market valuing their pension obligations. On the other hand unions and professional bodies, even local governments, could provide a very useful service to their members by arranging such a market and it would be a whole new business line for financial advisers. The article is linked from the FT (subscription only unfortunately) so it might be worth following the letters page.

    Comments

    Comment from WaltDe
    Time: September 1, 2006, 8:23 pm

    Keep up the great work on your blog. Best wishes WaltDe

    Pingback from Elephantstrunk » Trading pension liabilities
    Time: September 26, 2006, 11:54 am

    […] More interesting, not least because it is more visible is the Oliver Hemsley/Mark Wood vehicle Paternoster described here. Such moves are clearly of a piece with suggestions of a market in pension obligations. I don’t understand how this is supposed to work. If companies want to eliminate pension liability risk they can. The problem is that it is expensive to do. Effectively the pension fund provides cheap off-balance sheet junior debt and a lottery ticket and it would be a brave finance director that didn’t exploit it. See for example Accounting for Growth. Actuaries and trustees won’t tell them to fund the schemes better. I can only think they aim to assist in buyouts of various sorts. Being able to fix the pension liability could be very useful. […]

    Write a comment





    FireStats iconPowered by FireStats